Living a Holy Life

April 20, 2024 | Daniel L. Segraves, Ph.D.

I wrote the following article during the time I taught at Christian Life College in Stockton, California. It was required reading in one of my classes. The article is not a complete treatment of the biblical concept of holiness, and some of the statistics are dated. The information is, however, biblically sound and useful.

Living a Holy Life

A Clean Temple

God cares immensely for things reserved for His purposes. Because of their sanctified purpose, He will not tolerate their abuse.

A considerable portion of the Bible’s first five books contains explicit instructions concerning the proper use of the Tabernacle. Only the priests could enter the Holy Place, and then only after cleansing at the laver in the courtyard. The Holy of Holies could be entered only by the high priest once a year on the Day of Atonement. The priests had to be appropriately dressed and consecrated, and their behavior while in service had to conform to prescribed standards. When the Philistines took possession of the Ark of the Covenant, they found themselves continually plagued with unusual and deadly diseases. When Uzzah touched the Ark, he fell dead. As Belshazzar drank from the holy vessels, he sealed his fate, and the disembodied hand wrote it on the wall for all to see.

All these facts exemplify the truth that God will not allow abuse of holy things. “Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are” (I Corinthians 3:16-17).

Temple of the Holy Ghost

Specifically, it is your body which is the temple of the Holy Ghost. We should glorify God in our bodies and in our spirits which belong to God and are reserved for His holy purposes. (See I Corinthians 6:19-20.) This truth is so serious with God that He promises to destroy any who defile His temple.

Every sincere Christian should ask himself, “In what ways is it possible to defile my body? What steps of action can I take to purify the temple?”

Is defiling the temple purely a spiritual matter, or is it possible for the temple to be defiled by physical actions?

The scope of the Apostle Paul’s words in I Corinthians six is that the temple is defiled by moral impurity. While the root of moral impurity is a spiritual matter, it is ultimately expressed by the body. Paul said that a person who commits fornication with a harlot becomes one flesh with the harlot. (See I Corinthians 6:15-20.) The principle is that while the beginning of defilement is in the spirit, its final manifestation will be in the flesh. There is filthiness of both the flesh and the spirit, and we are to cleanse ourselves from both (II Corinthians 7:1).

What should be the attitude of the Christian toward fleshly sins which include, but are not limited to, drinking, smoking, and drug abuse? Are these purely physical matters, or do spiritual sins give birth to them? (See Mark 7:20-23.)

It is clear from Scripture that sin must have a body through which to express itself. This occurs as the members of the body are yielded to sinful practices. Paul admonished the Romans concerning this truth. “Let not sin therefore reign in your moral body, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof. Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin: but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God…. Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?” (Romans 6:12-13, 16).

It is, then, possible to sin with the body. Sinning is not just a matter of wrong attitudes or thoughts, although it includes these. Sin can be committed with the eyes, ears, hands, feet, mind, mouth, or any other member of the body. Jesus recognized the devastating effects of sins accomplished by body members and boldly announced that it would be better to be deprived of a hand, a foot, or an eye than to suffer the eternal fires of hell (Mark 9:43-48).

Christians should examine their physical habits to be certain they are not engaging in sinful practices. Since it is possible to sin with the body, and since the body of the believer is the temple of God, we must cleanse ourselves from the filthiness of the flesh according to God’s command.

Drinking

“Wine is a mocker, strong drink is raging: and whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise” (Proverbs 20:1).

There are three categories of references to wine or drinking in Scripture.

  • Where wine is mentioned, but neither endorsed nor condemned.
  • Where wine is identified as a source of misery and as an emblem of the wrath of God.
  • Where wine is identified as a blessing in conjunction with corn and bread.

Some religious movements permit or even encourage the use of intoxicants in moderation. A careful examination of Scripture will reveal, however, that alcoholic beverages are never spoken of favorably and that partaking of such beverages in any quantity is harmful to the human body. Intoxicants poison or fill the body with toxins. The intentional poisoning of our body abuses the temple of God. For these reasons, drinking is certainly a sinful practice in God’s eyes.

Those references to wine which fall under the first category previously mentioned cannot be appealed to in support of drinking. Scripture often mentions practices without condemning or endorsing them, purely as a part of a larger context of describing human actions.

The references in the second category clearly condemn the use of wine in any quantity. One of these denunciations of wine was written by Solomon, who had been blessed of God with great wisdom. He wrote, “Who hath woe? who hath sorrow? who hath contentions? who hath babbling? who hath wounds without cause? who hath redness of eyes? They that tarry long at the wine; they that go to seek mixed wine. Look not thou upon the wine when it is red, when it giveth his colour in the cup, when it moveth itself aright. At the last it biteth like a serpent, and stingeth like an adder. Thine eyes shall behold strange women, and thine heart shall utter perverse things. Yea, thou shalt be as he that lieth down upon the top of a mast. They have stricken me, shalt thou say, and I was not sick; they have beaten me, and I felt it not: when shall I awake? I will seek it yet again” (Proverbs 23:29-35).

This passage graphically describes the evils of drinking intoxicating beverages. The sure result is sorrow, woe, contention, senseless talk, and wounds. Drinking produces no good result. It breaks down moral restraints and causes people to say things they would never say otherwise. A person who drinks is in danger of immediate death due to the effects of intoxication, not to mention the long-term, addictive results of alcohol.

“Who to them that rise up early in the morning, that they may follow strong drink; that continue until night, till wine inflame them!” (Isaiah 5:11). “But they also have erred through wine, and through strong drink are out of the way; the priest and the prophet have erred through strong drink, they are swallowed up of wine, they are out of the way through strong drink; they err in vision, they stumble in judgment” (Isaiah 28:7). These verses show the addictive nature of intoxicating beverages and the fact that those who partake of them will err in matters of judgment; their senses are polluted.

It is the third category of references which prompts some to excuse alcoholic beverages, often with the hopeful intention to drink in moderation. There is no way to know how many have fallen into the treacherous trap of drunkenness by prefacing their tippling with, “After all, didn’t Paul tell Timothy to take a little wine for his stomach’s sake?”

There are two kinds of wines mentioned in Scripture.

As William Patton said in Bible Wines or Laws of Fermentation and Wines of the Ancients (reprinted by Sane Press), “There were … two kinds of wine in ancient use. The one was sweet, pleasant, refreshing, unfermented; the other was exciting, in- flaming, intoxicating. Each was called wine” (p. 132).

Patton meticulously documents the fact that unfermented beverages, called wines, existed and were commonly used by the ancients. He gives abundant proof of the generic nature of the two Hebrew words, yayin and shakar (pp. 56-58).

  • Yayin (translated “wine”) “designates grape-juice, or the liquid which the fruit of the vine yields. This may be new or old, sweet or sour, fermented or unfermented, intoxicating or unintoxicating” (p. 56).
  • Shakar (translated “strong drink”) “`signifies “sweet drink” expressed from fruits other than the grape, and drunk in an unfermented or fermented state’” (pp. 57, 58).

These two words are generic. In other words, they are used in Scripture to refer both to fermented and unfermented drink. The context determines which meaning is meant.

There are other relevant Hebrew words which always carry the same meaning. One of the most common is tirosh (translated “wine,” “new wine,” and “sweet wine”): this “wine” is an unfermented drink which generally refers to the juice of something other than the grape; for example, corn and olives.

The New Testament makes use of the generic Greek word oinos to correspond exactly to yayin in the Old Testament. It too designates the juice of the grape in all its stages. The context will determine whether fermented or unfermented beverage is meant.

The English word wine is from the Latin vinum, which is equivalent to the Greek oinos. Vinus is a generic word which refers to the juice of the grape in all its forms, as was the English wine during the era of the translation of the Authorized Version. More recent dictionaries will define wine exclusively as a fermented beverage, but we must be careful not to allow modern day usage of a word to be retroactive.

The reason for the development of the restricted meaning of wine to fermented liquid only is described by John Stuart Mill in his System of Logic: “A generic term is always liable to become limited to a single species if people have occasion to think and speak of that species oftener than of anything else contained in the genus. The tide of custom first drifts the word on the shore of a particular meaning, then retires and leaves it there.” (Quoted by Patton on pp. 63-64.)

What did Paul mean when he said to Timothy, “Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy stomach’s sake and thine often infirmities” (I Timothy 5:23). Did he command Timothy to indulge in fermented alcoholic beverages for the sake of a weak stomach? Such would seem precisely the wrong prescription if fermented wine was intended. Indeed, the fermented wines of that day produced “headaches, dropsy, madness, and stomach complaints” (Patton, p. 112). At the same time there were unfermented wines which were “exceedingly wholesome and useful to the body” (Patton, p. 113).

Surely Paul, who had earlier told Timothy that a bishop must not be given to wine (I Timothy 3:3), and who knew the inherent evil of fermented wine from the law (“wine is a mocker”), would not have recommended to Timothy such a forbidden, dangerous substance to drink in the place of water.

Some make their plea for moderate use of alcohol on the basis of a misunderstand- ing of Ephesians 5:18: “And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess….” They point out that one is not to drink to excess, or until he is drunk.

The literal meaning of the Greek word translated excess is, however, “dissolution, dissipation.” In this case the word excess does not refer to quantity, but to that which is inherent in fermented wine. The phrase, “wherein is,” reveals that the “excess” is in the wine. In other words, the use of fermented wine dissipates.

It has also been pointed out by physicians that the first drink of alcohol intoxicates. After that, the drunkenness is only a matter of degree.

Twenty-five percent of the American people are directly affected by alcoholism. Ninety percent of college students and seventy percent of high school students drink. These amazing statistics contributed to nearly 22,000 alcohol related deaths in one recent year among those in the fifteen to twenty-four age group. (Statistics from Christian School Comment, Vol. 12, No. 9.)

The only consistent Christian position is total abstinence from all alcoholic beverages. Moderation is the first step toward immoderation. The person who refuses to drink will never have to concern himself with fears of drinking too much. He will never be tempted to drunkenness or, in the more polite term of our society, alcoholism. He will live his life free from the ravages of liquor.

Smoking

It is a highly documented fact that smoking contributes to cancer of the lungs, mouth, and lips. So convincing is the evidence that the Surgeon General of the United States won the fight to have a warning placed on every package of cigarettes and every advertisement for cigarettes.

Tobacco is a habit-forming narcotic. Among unbiased researchers, there is no question as to the devastating effect of smoking on the human body.

Many godly men stood against the use of tobacco for years before medical research determined its danger. How did they have the foresight to avoid this dangerous practice?

While there is no verse which says, “Thou shalt not smoke,” there are many verses of Scripture which teach a Christian to resist coming under the power of any substance. A Christian should even resist falling under the power of lawful practices. Paul said, “All things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any” (I Corinthians 6:12). “Put a knife to thy throat,” Solomon warned, “if thou be a man given to appetite” (Proverbs 23:2).

There is no question that tobacco defiles the body, which is the temple of God. It coats the lungs with tar, promotes various ailments including cancer, and robs the smoker of vitality, alertness, and years of life.

Would God have approved of a vandal entering His Holy of Holies in the Tabernacle and painting the Ark of the Covenant with a tar brush? Of course not. Neither can He approve of His children defiling the temple of the body. God will surely judge those who defile His temple.

Drug Abuse

In many ways, all that has previously been said about alcohol and tobacco applies equally to the abuse of drugs.

There is, however, a scripturally endorsed use of medicine. (See Proverbs 17:22.) Jesus recognized the value of physicians to the sick (Matthew 9:12). Luke continued to be referred to as “the beloved physician” long after his conversion (Colossians 4:14).

It is wrong, of course, to trust solely in physicians or medicines. One’s trust must be in the Lord and He must be recognized as the source of all healing.

Many question the wisdom of the philosophy of the modern medical profession toward drugs. Ethical dilemmas may present themselves, specifically related to the frequent prescription of placebos. In fact, Dr. Sissela Bock has said that half of all prescriptions written are for placebos.

Doctors debate the ethics of charging the high prices for placebos which are demanded for drugs, but others point out that if the placebos were sold for their actual value, the patient would immediately suspect that his prescription was not real medicine and would thus have no confidence in it.

But aside from the questions of drug use as related to the medical profession, today we face the epidemic of drug abuse by people of all ages. The problem ranges, for example, from those who smoke marijuana to Valium addiction.

Christian must not allow themselves to come under the power of any habit-forming drug. It has been documented repeatedly in volumes of scientific and medical reports that drug abuse is a deadly pursuit. The only individuals who question these findings are those who for personal gain or pleasure wish to excuse the abuse of drugs. They might insist that some great, mysterious conspiracy exists to keep them from experiencing the harmless pleasures of drugs.

But where are the healthy drug addicts? There are none. As has been witnessed repeatedly, drugs kill mercilessly those who have done the most to popularize their use.

The word that is translated “witchcraft” or “sorcery” in our English Bible is pharmakeia, the same word from which we get “pharmacy.” It implies the abuse of drugs to induce altered stages of consciousness to aid in occultic practices. It is listed with the works of the flesh in Galatians 5:20, and it is one of the things which will bar one from the kingdom of God.

What effect does drug abuse have on our society?

  • More than half the deaths on American highways are alcohol or drug related.
  • More than half the crashes in small non-commercial aircraft are caused by alcohol or drugs.
  • Eighty-five percent of physical child abuse in America is caused by parents who are “stoned out of their minds” (Christian School Comment, Vol. 12, No. 9).

There is no justification for the use of drugs by Christians. It is a mind-altering, violence-producing, habit-forming, disease-developing practice which must be shunned as yet another satanic attempt to defile the temple of God.

Drinking, smoking, and drug abuse are not the only ways in which a Christian can defile the holy temple of his body. But these are three of the most common and visible ways, and they must be shunned at any cost. The Christian who stands for total abstinence from alcohol, tobacco, and drugs will shine as a bright light in a dark, corrupt world.

[archive]

Presentation at the Urshan Graduate School of Theology Symposium

April 5, 2024 | Daniel L. Segraves, Ph.D.

On February 16, 2024, I presented a paper titled “Aramaic Influences on Messianic Psalms 80-81” at the UGST Symposium. This paper was part of my research for the second volume of my commentary on the Book of Psalms. The first volume is titled The Messiah in the Psalms: Discovering Christ in Unexpected Places. It covers Psalms 1-72. The second volume will cover Psalms 73-106. It will be my twenty-second book. All my books as well as digital resources are available at pentecostalpublishing.com. The books are also available at amazon.com.

[archive]

An Unusual Post

March 14, 2024 | Daniel L. Segraves, Ph.D.

A friend recently asked me to help respond to a biblical question asked by another person. It didn’t take long for me to discover that the question came from another person’s website. Ordinarily, the source of the question wouldn’t have mattered, but I was surprised to see that the author of the article misrepresented my educational background, claiming I have “no degree in Greek” and that it “would be impossible to find a Greek language expert who agrees with” me “on the word definitions imperative to understanding the passage of I Corinthians 11:2-16.”

I bear the article’s author no animosity, but I think correcting an error in this statement is important. I earned 13 semester hours in New Testament Greek, 10 of which were graduate-level in my Master of Arts in Exegetical Theology program. This was with straight A ‘s. I graduated with highest honors from Western Seminary (www.westernseminary.edu) in this 64 semester hour degree program, which included three semesters of Biblical Hebrew with straight A’s. Not only did I study Hebrew in my seminary classes; I was also tutored in Hebrew by the Director of Education at Temple Israel, a Jewish synagogue in Stockton, California. This degree program concluded with the writing of a thesis that made use of the skills I had learned in my study of the Greek language. At the request of one of my professors, I presented a condensed version of that thesis to the Far West Meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society. 

After graduation with the M.A.E.T., I completed the advanced Master of Theology degree at Western Seminary’s Portland, Oregon campus. It took five years for me to complete this degree, which concluded in the writing of another thesis that made use of the Hebrew language as it appears in the Book of Psalms. I earned the Th.M. with honors, and this degree enabled me to qualify for entry to the Ph.D. program at the Regent University School of Divinity.

It took me eight years to complete the Ph.D. in Renewal Studies with dual emphases in Christian Theology and History of Global Christianity. I fulfilled all of the required courses and a dissertation that was awarded “passed with distinction.” As with most Ph.D. programs in theology, I was required to complete another language course in addition to Hebrew and Greek. I fulfilled this requirement by taking and passing a course in Theological German.

I have taught New Testament Greek at the undergraduate and graduate levels, as well as Biblical Hebrew at the undergraduate level.

My educational journey was not unusual for those who give their lives to research, writing, and teaching in the disciplines of the Bible and theology. All those who teach in these fields at the graduate level at Urshan Graduate School of Theology have fulfilled similar requirements.

Now, back the questions asked by my friend’s friend. If he has not done so, I suggest that he read my book Hair Length in the Bible: A Study of I Corinthians 11:2-16 (Hazelwood, MO: Word Aflame Press, 2007). This book was edited by David K. Bernard, D.Th. and includes the following chapters: (1) Introduction to I Corinthians 11:2-16; (2) Analysis of I Corinthians 11:2-16); (3) The Voice of History; (4) Answers to Objections; and (5) The Letter and the Spirit. The book includes a substantial amount of references to Greek resources supporting the position taken in the book.

In addition to this, I would like to call attention to the Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains, Second Edition, by Johannes P. Louw and Eugene A. Nida (New York: United Bible Societies, 1989). This resource is specifically designed for use by Bible translators. As it relates to the meaning of κομάω,  L-N says “to wear long hair as part of one’s attire—‘to have long hair, to appear with long hair, to wear long hair.’ γυνὴ δὲ ἐὰν κομᾷ δόξα αὐτῇ ἐστιν ‘if a woman wears long hair, it is a pride for her’ 1 Cor 11:15. In a number of languages it may be necessary to translate κομάω as ‘to let one’s hair grow long’ or ‘not to cut one’s hair.’

The point given here to those who are involved in the work of Bible translating is this: If the receptor language (the language into which Scripture is being translated) does not have a word that inherently means “not to cut one’s hair” or “let one’s hair grow,” the translation should describe this as the meaning of κομάω in the form of a sentence.

[archive]

Urshan Symposium of Apostolic Pentecostal Scholars

February 12, 2024 | Daniel L. Segraves, Ph.D.

https://www.evernote.com/shard/s656/sh/5f508025-e398-46c4-b6c8-fb9b5157de23/QzeFCSEULGvdglzH0FC5U50U8f4qefJoOg40xXaLaBp2jqs-82coEqCy0w

The Urshan Symposium of Apostolic Pentecostal Scholars will meet on the campus of Urshan Graduate School of Theology in Wentzville, Missouri on February 15-16, 2024. Thirty papers will be presented to fulfill the symposium’s mission to provide a collaborative venue for engagement in the diverse fields of Apostolic scholarship and their application within the life of the church.

Six plenary sessions will be offered with a variety of speakers including Dr. David K. Bernard, the general superintendent of the United Pentecostal Church International.

I plan to present a paper titled “Aramaic and LXX Influences on Messianic Psalms 80-81,” which is intended for inclusion in the second volume of my commentary on the Book of Psalms.

Schedule of Events

THURSDAY

Registration – 11:00am-1:00pm

Faculty and Prospective Student Mixer (Limited to Registered Previewers) – Noon – 1:00 pm

Devotion – 1:00–1:15pm, Dr. Cindy Miller

Plenary Session #1 – 1:20–1:55pm – “A Transcendental Phenomenological Study of Clergy Hindrances to Seeking Help and Implementing Self-Care for Overcoming Stress and Burnout” – Kerri Wilson

Plenary Session #2 – 2:00pm-4:15pm, Local Church Governance, Facilitator: Dr. Norris

1. Strong Pastor Model: Rev. Eli Lopez

a. Respondent: Rev. David Huston

b. Follow-up by Rev. Eli Lopez

2. Churchwork: Working Towards a Pentecostal Ecclesiology: Rev. Rodney Shaw

a. Respondent: Rev. Tom Trimble

b. Follow-up by Rodney Shaw

3. Abuse of Pastoral Authority: Servant Leadership as a Preventative Model: Rev. Lisa Reddy

a. Respondent: Dr. Chad Flowers

b. Follow-up by Lisa Reddy

4. General Q&A

Split Session: Bible College Papers – 4:20-5:00pm

Split Session: Studies in Acts – 4:20-5:50pm

1. “The God-Ordained Appointment that Orchestrated Firsthand Apostolic Testimony of the Spirit Baptism on the Samaritans” – Rev. LJ Harry

2. “Luke’s Narrative Approach in Acts 9:1–20” – Adam Andris

3. “The Chiastic Narrative of Acts 16:16–40: Binding and Loosing Modeled in Exorcism to

Imprisonment” – Rev. Carla Burton

4. “Paul and Socrates at Areopagus: The Triumph of Christianity’s First Defense before

Greek Intellectuals” – Rev. Kade Wilson

5. General Q&A

Split Session: Practical Theology Papers – 4:20-5:00pm

1. “Using a Team Model for Quality Assurance in Apostolic Translation” – Dr. Liane Grant

2. “Analyzing Trends in Small Group Ministry” – Rev. LeeAnn Alexander

3. General Q&A

Dinner Break – 5:50–7:30pm

Plenary Session #3 – 7:30pm-9:00pm – Urshan Chapel, Speaker: David K. Bernard

FRIDAY

Plenary Session #4 – 9:00-11:15am

The Church and Culture

1. Speaking in Tongues in Popular Culture: Dr. Chris Paris

a. Respondent: Rev. Jason Weatherly

b. Follow-up by Chris Paris

2. Why Theology is Important: The UPCI and the Theology of Race: Dr. Robin Johnston

a. Respondent: Rev. Micheal D. Robinson, PhD

b. Follow-up by Robin Johnston

3. Retention of Youth in the Apostolic Church: Dr. Margaret Banks

a. Respondent: Rev. Cullen Chrestman

b. Follow-up by Margaret Banks

4. General Q&A

Plenary Session #5 – 11:20am-12:00pm – “‘Be Baptized Now, and Baptize Us Also: Reframing

the Narrative of Andrew D. Urshan’s Encounter with Russian Pentecostals” – Rev. Jacob A. Palma

Lunch Break – 12:00-1:30pm

Split Session – Scholarly Dialogue – Biblical Theology – 1:30-3:25pm; Facilitator: Dr. Jared

Runck

1. “John for Readers of Luke-Acts: Backwards Reading Strategies and Literary

One-Upmanship” – Dr. Jeffrey Brickle

a. Respondent: Dr. Jeremy Painter

b. Follow-up by Jeffrey Brickle

2. “Johannine Christology: Background to the Prologue” – Dr. David Norris

a. Respondent – Dr. Jeffrey Brickle

b. Follow-up by David Norris

3. “Aramaic and LXX Influences on Messianic Psalms” – Dr. Daniel Segraves

a. Respondent: Dr. Chris Paris

b. Follow-up by Daniel Segraves

4. General Q&A

Split Session – Scholarly Dialogues – Practical Theology, Location: Urshan Chapel, 1:30pm – 4:05 pm; Facilitator: Dr. Cindy Miller

1:30-2:45pm

“Self Care as Stewardship” – Dr. Jennifer McCurrach

● The Mediating Factor of Servant Leadership in Ministerial Compassion Fatigue” – Rev.

Kara S. McCoy

“A Five-Point Biblical Model as A Holistic Mental Health Intervention” – Amberlin Salas

● Panel and General Q&A — Rev. Mitchell Bland and Dr. Dan Butler

2:45-4:05pm

“Diversity and Leadership in the Church” – Dr. Melvin Reddy

○ Respondent: Dr. Dan Butler

○ Follow-up by Melvin Reddy

“The Great Omission: Factors that Drive Underutilization of the Edification Gift of Apostleship in the Contemporary Church” – Dr. Clay Jackson

○ Respondent: TBD

○ Follow-up by Dr. Jackson

● General Q&A

Practical Theology / Ministry Paper Presentations, Location: Urshan Chapel – 4:10-5:00 pm

“Making Student Learning More Effective and Transformational” – Dr. Lisa De Leon

“A Connection between Adult English Language Learners and the Church” – Francy

Miller

● General Q&A

Split Session: Paper Presentations – Biblical Theology Track, 3:30-5:00pm – Facilitator – Dr. David Norris                              ● “Ears to Hear and Eyes to See: A Biblical Theology of Sensory Dysfunction and its

Implication for Apostolic Hermeneutics” – Rev. Joshua Abrego (PhD Candidate)

“Rethinking Heaven: Towards a More Biblical Eschatological Framework” – Jasher

Henderson

“‘O God’ or ‘God Is?’: An Inductive Approach to the Grammar of Hebrews 1:8 / Psalm

44:7 LXX” – Clayton Killion

“The Power of Grace in Pastoral Leadership: A Socio-Historical Analysis of Paul’s

Theology of Power in the Corinthian Correspondence” – Rev. Seth Simmons

● General Q&A

Split Session: Paper Presentations Historical / Other Track, Location TBD – 3:30-5:00pm –

Facilitator – Dr. Dan Littles

“The Structure of the Heavenly Host and Its Role in the Cosmological Understanding of

the Early Church” – Rev. Brian Roberts                                                                                                           

 ● “Pre-Modern Pentecostal Movement Glossolalia” – Rev. R. Kent Smith

“The Good, the Bad, and the Beautiful: A Conceptual Analysis of the Theological

Framework Imposed upon the Translation Process of the 1611 KJV” – Rev. Lori Wagner

● General Q&A

Dinner Break – 5:00–7:00pm

Plenary Session #6 – 7:00pm-8:30pm – Urshan Chapel; Speaker: Rev. Eli Lopez

Mission Statement:

To provide a collaborative venue for engagement in the diverse fields of Apostolic scholarship and their application within the life of the church.

Objectives:

Create a framework that enables mutual support among Apostolic scholars in the spirit of Christian love and fidelity to sacred scripture.

Draw from a wide range of ancient and modern sources, texts, and traditions to enhance, strengthen, and support the faith of the church.

Facilitate collaborative work that employs diverse practices of inquiry and scholarship reflecting the varied expertise and life of the global church.

Create resources in a variety of mediums for dissemination to the church at large.

Participants:

The participants in the Urshan Symposium of Apostolic Pentecostal Scholars shall be composed of persons belonging to the Apostolic Pentecostal faith tradition, who are interested in both engaging with and contributing to scholarship within the Apostolic Pentecostal movement. Submissions from scholars with at least a master’s degree are given preference, but proposals from students, autodidacts, and experienced ministers are welcome.

Local Housing:

Fairfield Inn

130 Crossroads S Dr, Wentzville, MO 63385

Phone: (636) 332-5000

Ask for the Urshan College Rate. Indicate that you are personally paying for the room, not direct bill.

Hampton Inn

150 Wentzville Bluffs Drive Wentzville, MO 63385

(636) 445-3780

Ask for the Urshan College Rate. Indicate that you are personally paying for the room, not direct bill.

[archive]

Learning Biblical Aramaic

January 8, 2024 | Daniel L. Segraves, PhD

Today I began a formal study of the Aramaic language as it is used in Scripture. As I have worked on the second volume of my commentary on the Book of Psalms, it has become clear to me that it is necessary for me to achieve a working knowledge of Aramaic in order to accomplish this task.

Aramaic is found in a variety of places in the Old Testament, with a substantial portion of Daniel and Ezra originally written in the language. Small portions of other Old Testament texts include Aramaic. Jesus spoke Aramaic, the common conversational language of Israel in the first century, and the language is also discovered in a variety of New Testament writings.

In addition, the Aramaic Targums, paraphrases of the Hebrew Scriptures which were read in first century synagogues to help the people understand the meaning of the texts, can give us insight today into how the early Christian believers understood the Messianic content of the Old Testament. For instance, I will present a paper at the upcoming symposium sponsored by Urshan Graduate School of Theology titled, “Aramaic and LXX Influences on Messianic Psalms 80 and 81.” This symposium will convene on the campus of UGST on February 15-16, 2024.

The course of study I have undertaken is available from Zondervan Academic Online Courses. The professor who teaches the course is Miles V. Van Pelt. Van Pelt earned his Ph.D. at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and is the Alan Hayes Belcher, Jr. Professor of Old Testament and Biblical Languages and the director of the Summer Institute for Biblical Languages at Reformed Theological Seminary in Jackson, Mississippi, where he has served for more than twenty years. The course materials include a textbook written by Van Pelt and published by Zondervan Academic, titled Basics of Biblical Aramaic: Complete Grammar, Lexicon, and Annotated Text. This book is now in its second edition. Van Pelt has studied the biblical languages for more than thirty years.

The course lectures are delivered by video. I have found them to be professionally produced. Van Pelt is an expert in his field. His presentations are clear and easy to follow.

At the beginning of the course, students are informed that they will need to have completed at least one year of Biblical Hebrew before embarking on the study of Aramaic. The two languages share the same alphabet and a variety of other linguistic characteristics. Those who have successfully completed the Hebrew will have a good foundation for the study of Aramaic, but if their Hebrew is “rusty,” they will need to take the time to overcome that deficit. The Aramaic course is designed to be completed within one year.

As I begin what I know will be a challenge, I am grateful for the way our Lord has directed my steps up until this time. When five of our professors at Christian Life College enrolled as students in Western Seminary in 1990 to fulfill the requirements to maintain the state approval of the school, four of us enrolled in Hebrew and completed three semesters of the language. At the same time, I arranged for the director of education at a local Jewish synagogue to come to our campus weekly and tutor us in the Hebrew language. This was a great help to us. After graduating from Western with my first master’s degree — the Master of Arts in Exegetical Theology — I took advantage of Western’s policy of allowing graduates to return to the classroom to sit in on classes they had already taken and successfully passed for refreshment in the course content. This second exposure to Hebrew was with a professor who had lived in Israel for twenty years and who was a professional archaeologist.

As time went by, I taught Biblical Hebrew at Christian Life College. In view of the importance of having a solid foundation in Hebrew in order to begin the study of Aramaic, I’m thankful for how God has directed my steps to this moment.

[archive]

Substantial Savings Until December 31, 2023

I noticed this sale information in today’s email. It includes 18 of my books, including my newest book, The Holy Spirit: A Commentary. This hardback, 314 page work examines nearly every reference to the Holy Spirit from the first chapter of Genesis to the last chapter of Revelation. I encourage you to take a look at these resources while this price reduction is available. You can find full information at pentecostalpublishing.com or https://pentecostalpublishing.com/search?q=Segraves.

[archive]

Getting Up to Date on the Psalms Project

November 22, 2023 | Daniel L. Segraves, Ph.D.

I have completed my work on Psalm 84 and am now finishing Psalm 85. I have also finalized Psalms 132 and 110, from which Jesus quoted and which is referred to about twenty-two times in the New Testament. In addition, I am near the end of Psalm 91, from which Satan quoted in his temptation of Jesus.

I hope to finish the second volume of my commentary on Psalms in time for it to be published for the 2024 general conference of the United Pentecostal Church International.

The work I have done for Psalm 84 consists of eight pages. In general, I try to conclude my comments on each psalm with insights into its messianic nature, although the psalms are so rich in messianic content that it is not unusual for these insights to be threaded throughout each one.

Here is the final paragraph of my comments on Psalm 84: Since the Messiah is the Lord, He can give grace and glory. He withholds nothing good from those who are upright. With its look back to Psalm 2:12, Psalm 84:12 pronounces a blessing on all those who trust in the Lord of Hosts, known in the Targum as “your Memra,” and who is also identified in the Second Psalm as “the Son.”

[archive]

Praying for the Peace of Jerusalem

November 3, 2023 | Daniel L. Segraves, Ph.D.

A bit earlier this afternoon, I sent a text to my son, Mark, with the following message:

With the war today in the Middle East, Susan (my wife) and I have been following the news much more closely and talking quite a bit about the Jewish people and antisemitism. When Susan was a student at the Apostolic Bible Institute, she worked for a Jewish family in the afternoons when classes were over and on Saturdays, doing light housework and helping with the evening meals. The family was very kind to her, providing a nice upstairs room where she could study and stay overnight when needed. Susan also had the privilege of driving their beautiful Buick convertible if she had need of it when the family was not using it. Susan was very popular in school! She just showed me that our wall oven has an automatic setting for the Sabbath, so devout Jews will not need to violate the Law’s prohibition against lighting a fire on the Sabbath!

Mark responded:

That’s interesting! We’ve been praying for the peace of Jerusalem. I think that may be the same as praying, “Jesus, come quickly!”

I answered, “It could very well be!” I had been thinking about Scripture’s command to pray for the peace of Jerusalem, but I hadn’t connected it to the idea of praying for the Second Coming. So Mark’s comment provoked me to check and see what John H. Sailhamer, one of my favorite seminary professors, may have said about this idea. I had the privilege of taking two classes from Sailhamer when I was working on my Master of Theology degree at Western Seminary. The first was his class on Psalms and Daniel, which transformed my thinking on Psalms so that I wrote a 382 page book titled The Messiah in the Psalms: Discovering Christ in Unexpected Places (Hazelwood, MO: WAP Academic, 2007). This book is available at pentecostalpublishing.com and in the Kindle format from Amazon.com. I am also working now on the second volume of this commentary on Psalms, which I hope to have in publication by the time of the 2024 general conference of the United Pentecostal Church International.

So, I turned to Sailhamer’s thoughts on Psalm 122 and read these words:

To pray for the peace of Jerusalem is to pray for the coming of the Promised Seed of David, the Messiah.

Jerusalem is mentioned by name three times in Psalm 122. There is a reference to the house of David. It is a good thing to meditate on the entire psalm:

PSALM 122

A Song of Ascents. Of David.

1 I was glad when they said to me, “Let us go into the house of the LORD.”
2 Our feet have been standing
  Within your gates, O Jerusalem!

3 Jerusalem is built
  As a city that is compact together,
4 Where the tribes go up,
  The tribes of the LORD,
  To the Testimony of Israel,
  To give thanks to the name of the LORD.
5 For thrones are set there for judgment,
  The thrones of the house of David.

6 Pray for the peace of Jerusalem:
  “May they prosper who love you.
7 Peace be within your walls,
  Prosperity within your palaces.”
8 For the sake of my brethren and companions,
  I will now say, “Peace be within you.”
9 Because of the house of the LORD our God
  I will seek your good.

[NKJV]

[archive]